Ronald Reagan's presidency signaled a critical period for organized labor, a time when unions began shrinking at a much faster pace and it became more acceptable for businesses to fight off labor organizations.þþBut what remains in dispute about his legacy is whether the former president's actions triggered a decline in union membership or accelerated a trend that was had already begun.þþÿIt isn't clear whether Reagan set the tone for the '80s and into the '90s, or whether he reflected changes in society,ÿ said Charles Craver, a labor law professor at George Washington University Law School and author of Can Unions Survive? The Rejuvenation of the American Labor Movement.þþThe percentage of the American work force that was unionized peaked in the 1950s at about 35 percent and had fallen to 23 percent by the time Reagan was elected in 1980, according to Craver and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.þþDuring the decades leading up to Reagan's presidency, the number of union members grew - but not as quickly as the work force was expanding.þþThe culture had started to change, America was becoming more conservative, and employers were becoming more strongly anti-union, Craver said.þþAn important turning point came in 1981, shortly after Reagan took office, when he fired about 12,000 federal air traffic controllers who went out on strike.þþThe controllers - represented by one of the few unions that supported Reagan in his bid for presidency, the Professional Air Traffic Controllers' Organization or PATCO - were fired for violating a law that forbids federal workers from striking.þþBy carrying out his threat to fire the controllers if they did not return to work Reagan not only set limits for public employee unions, but also signaled that it was OK for businesses to play hardball with private sector unions.þþ'Sent a message' þþÿThe biggest thing that that did was it sent a message to the private employer community that it would be all right to go up against the unions,ÿ Craver said. ÿWhether he intended to do that, I don't know.ÿþþAfter the PATCO strike, the number of union members began to decline.þþOnly about 12.9 percent of workers belonged to a union last year, according to the most recent numbers available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.þþÿBeginning in the '70s you started to have a number of corporations who began to challenge labor, not just at the negotiating table, began to challenge the legitimacy of organized labor,ÿ said John Jordan, president of Washington public relations firm Principor Communications and a union organizer for 10 years.þþ'Opened floodgates' þþÿThis really didn't become mainstream acceptable until Reagan broke the PATCO union, and that really opened the floodgates to a major effort on the part of corporate America to essentially beat labor back into a corner to a place where they haven't recovered yet,ÿ said Jordan.þþThe National Air Traffic Controllers Association, which was formed to represent the controllers after PATCO was broken in the strike, declined to comment on Reagan this week other than to offer condolences to his family.þþIronically, Reagan served as president of the Screen Actors Guild from 1947 to 1952 and then again in 1959 for a year.þþSome industry experts said the criticism he received during and after the PATCO strike was undeserved.þþGary Chaison, industrial relations professor at Clark University in Worcester, Mass., said the PATCO incident was a cut-and-dried case of federal employees who challenged the president and said they would strike even though it was illegal.þþNo evidence þþÿYou will hear people say that after Ronald Reagan replaced the air traffic controllers, American employers started to replace strikers,ÿ Chaison said.þþÿI have never seen any evidence that decisions by management at private companies replace strikers were a result of Reagan's actions.ÿþþReagan became president at a time when the labor movement had weakened, making him a very easy scapegoat for its problems, Chaison said.þþBefore Reagan, labor always felt it had an ear in the White House.þþBut during his administration, labor leaders began to feel marginalized, Chaison said.þþÿI do think that Reagan showed the labor movement how important it is to have a friend in the White House and how vulnerable the labor movement can be if they have someone who's not a friend,ÿ Chaison said, ÿbecause there were no labor law reforms passed, the minimum wage laws were not changed, foreign competition grew tremendously and ate away union jobs.ÿþþ'Stacked' labor board þþReagan also made it much more difficult for workers who wanted to have a union to get one, said Gordon Lafer, an associate professor at the University of Oregon's labor education and research center.þþÿReagan stacked the labor board with people who are anti-union,ÿ Lafer said. The right to strike became more theoretical and less real, he noted.þþWhile Reagan did appoint members to the National Labor Relations Board who reflected his political views, previous administrations also had appointed board members who shared their ideologies, noted Alan Draper, a professor of government at St. Lawrence University in Canton, N.Y.þþReagan simply took it to a new level, appointing members who were very anti-union, he said.þþÿThe Reagan years accentuated and exaggerated a trend of decline that was already present before Reagan came on the scene,ÿ Draper said.þþ
Source: Chicago Tribune
